Thanks for bringing this proposal to our DAO Dialectic. It is good to see all sorts of stakeholders are concerned to bring this to a good and weighted outcome. It is indeed a significant change that warrants a thorough discussion. Ample discussion time ensures no rushed decisions are made. Something the DAO supports.
At the same time, we note that discussion in the main thread has died down. With more than 80 replies and the last comment 6 days ago, it appears most arguments have been made on both sides. This is further evidenced by the fact that YGG and MC came to a provisional agreement on a settlement. Something we understand and are delighted to hear Dialectic as assisted in. In light of the counterproposal, MIP-14, this extra time might not be warranted anymore. At the same time, we believe it is good to have an extra safety mechanism for the DAO.
We propose to see if there is community support for prolonging the effect date of MIP-13 for extra discussion time or as a safety mechanism, before bringing it to vote as a MIP. To make sure we are not muddying the waters with too many votes and increasing the complexity. If there is interest and if MIP-14 needs more time. It would have to go to vote Thursday 11:40 CET at the latest. It would effectively be a vote for another ’ YES = prolong the discussion / solution period vote’ ‘NO = Yes to MIP-13’.
If MIP-14 goes up for vote in the next days, there is probably no reason for this to go to vote.